IPG Diode Heaters vs. Infrared Lamps
The drive to move away from convection furnaces to a higher speed solution has led some battery manufacturers to consider infrared lamp solutions. Lamps create infrared light similar to diode laser heaters and deliver similarly fast drying speeds. While infrared lamps are more efficient than convection furnaces, they are still significantly more costly to operate than a diode laser solution.
Data based on the estimated costs of operating a 520 kW furnace for 8,000 hours per year
Heating Efficiency: Lasers direct their energy only at the electrode slurry rather than radiating heat in a larger area. Infrared bulbs reach extremely high temperatures and direct heat imprecisely, generating substantial waste heat that is absorbed by the oven walls rather than the electrode slurry. Flammable electrode slurry solvent vapors are also at risk of being ignited by these bulbs, forcing manufacturers to use electricity to redirect this excess heat.
Maintenance: IPG diode heaters are maintenance free with an expected lifetime of 7+ years. Infrared bulbs last only 1 to 2 years, requiring a regular maintenance cycle and costly replacement.
Process Control: IPG diode heaters are "cold" furnaces that support in situ process monitoring to ensure consistent slurry drying results. Infrared bulbs start degrading from the moment they are turned on and often at varying rates. As a result, maintaining a balanced temperature distribution across the foil web is a challenge, excacerbated by limited process monitoring options inside the hot oven.